For years, educational qualifications served as the most visible signals of employability. A degree from a recognised institution fast-tracked a candidate into the recruitment process, while an employer’s reputation and career progression helped attract talent.
That equation is changing. As AI reshapes job requirements, organisations are exploring ways to identify what candidates can do, rather than relying solely on their academics. In a skills-first economy, companies must communicate not only why people should join them, but also how they recognise potential and create opportunities for people with diverse backgrounds.
India provides useful examples of this transition. In 2018, IBM collaborated with India’s Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship to introduce a technical diploma curriculum focused on IT, cloud computing and networking. The initiative was designed to develop job-ready skills for emerging technology roles, including positions that do not always require a traditional four-year degree.
More recently, Accenture’s India careers guidance has stated that not every role requires a four-year degree and that requirements depend on a specific position. The company’s careers page provides a concrete example of how employers can communicate a more flexible approach to qualifications.
These examples do not mean degrees have become irrelevant. Many professions require specific qualifications, and formal education remains an important foundation for numerous careers. Rather, they illustrate a broader shift towards assessing candidates against the capabilities a role demands.
For employer branding teams, the implications extend well beyond recruitment advertisements. Traditional employer branding often emphasised a familiar set of promises: a prestigious workplace, attractive compensation and opportunities for advancement.
These remain important, but candidates increasingly want to understand how an organisation invests in their future. Can employees learn new technologies? Does the company recognise skills acquired through projects, certifications or practical experience?
These questions influence how prospective employees evaluate an employer.
Consequently, employer branding needs to become more evidence led. Instead of describing themselves as a learning destination, companies can demonstrate the training available, the skills employees have developed, and the opportunities created through internal mobility.
Employee stories can be particularly valuable here. A credible account of someone who transitioned into a new function, developed expertise through structured training or progressed through an unconventional career path can make a company’s talent proposition more tangible.
The same principle applies to recruitment communication. If a company claims to hire for skills, its job descriptions, assessment processes and selection criteria should reflect that commitment. Advertising a skills-first philosophy while filtering candidates primarily through unnecessary qualification requirements creates a credibility gap.
There is another dimension to this shift: the relationship between employer branding and learning culture.
As businesses adopt AI and automate tasks, employees need opportunities to adapt. Hiring skilled people is only one part of the challenge; organisations must also help existing employees develop the capabilities required for changing roles. Companies that communicate both external hiring opportunities and internal reskilling pathways can present a more convincing account of how they prepare their workforce for change.
For PR professionals, this means moving beyond the familiar language of awards and workplace accolades. These can provide third-party validation, but they don’t explain what working at an organisation means in practice. A stronger narrative connects the company’s business strategy with the experience it offers employees. If innovation is its priority, how are employees encouraged to experiment and learn? If adaptability is essential, what support exists for people whose roles evolve? If the organisation values diverse talent, how does it recognise different ways of acquiring expertise?
The answers should come from actual policies and employee experiences. There is also a responsibility to communicate honestly. A skills-first economy does not eliminate competition, qualification requirements or unequal access to opportunity. Employers should avoid suggesting that a short course guarantees a job or that formal education has lost its value.
Ultimately, employer branding is becoming more about demonstrating a credible relationship between talent, opportunity and growth. In a skills-first economy, the strongest employer proposition would be that the company provides people opportunities to become better at what they do.
For communications leaders, that is a more demanding story to tell. It also offers a more sustainable foundation for attracting talent.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The views and opinions published here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the publisher.
